The FBI Raids Fulton County ft. FBI Director Kash Patel

00:00:03 Speaker 1: My name is Charlie Kirk. I run the largest pro American student organization in the country, fighting for the future of our republic. My call is to fight evil and to proclaim truth. If the most important thing for you is just feeling good, you're gonna end up miserable. But if the most important thing is doing good, you'll end up purposeful. College is a scam, everybody. You got to stop sending your kids to college. You should get married as young as possible and have as many kids as possible. Go start at turning point you would say, college chapter. Go start attning point. Yould say high school chapter. Go find out how your church can get involved. Sign up and become an activist. I gave my life to the Lord in fifth grade, most important decision I ever made in my life, and I encourage you to do the same. Here I am. 00:00:46 Speaker 2: Lord, Use me. 00:00:48 Speaker 1: Buckle up, everybody, Here we go. The Charlie Kirk Show is proudly sponsored by Preserved Gold, leading gold and silver experts and the only precious metals company. I recommend to my family, friends and. 00:01:06 Speaker 3: Viewers, Welcome to The Charlie Kirk Show. January twenty nine, twenty twenty six. Here at the Bitcoin dot Com studios to our Real America's Voice audience. We are going to cut away just briefly from the President's Cabinet meeting and we will get back to that in just a sec. But we want to talk with FBI Director Cash Battel, who is making time to join us here. Welcome to the show, mister director. 00:01:31 Speaker 4: It's always great to be with you guys. Thanks for having me on. 00:01:34 Speaker 3: Well, thank you for making the time for us. We get right into it. Yesterday was a big day. There was a FBI warrant that was executed at the main election warehouse operations center in Fulton County, Georgia, relating to the twenty twenty election. 00:01:51 Speaker 5: What can you tell us, sir, Yeah. 00:01:53 Speaker 4: Thanks so much for having me. As you know, I really don't do these types of appearances, but I wanted to address it because it's of great public importance. And let me just set the backdrop. President Trump, under his leadership and under the Department of Justice and the Attorney General, have made it a priority to reduce crime and safeguard American citizenry. That's why this FBI, along with our partners, were able to produce a reduction in the murder rate by twenty percentage points from coast to coast. That is an all time record for the modern era. This FBI has arrested sixty seven thousand people in the last year. That's a two hundred and ten percent increase from the year before. And we're seizing funds and all at record levels and enough to kill one hundred and fifty million Americans, thirty five percent more espionage arrests. The reason I go through these statistics is because within these statistics are live saves and communities safeguarded by President Trump's brilliant leadership and our great partners at the Department of Justice under Attorney General Pambondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche And the reason I bring these things out and we captured six top ten of the FBI's most wanted in one year, including Ryan Wedding and another individual in Mexico just last week where I was. And the reason I go through this is because we, thanks to President Trump, are a law enforcement police force for the United States government, and we take these cases seriously, and we go into court and we present the facts and we work the legal process. And that's what you saw yesterday. It was a DOJ and FBI effort to present after an extended period of time of investigations because, as you know, any of these cases, the ones I just talked about in general or this one specifically, take time to develop. We have to go out and conduct investigations, interrogations, interviews, collect information data and synthesize them with our brilliant partners at DJ to present. And that's what I want to highlight. The FBIDJ presented this information to a judge in Georgia where they determined the judge that there was a finding for probable cause following the constitutional precepts that are necessary to safeguard an investigation, just like any other we do. And what we did yesterday was we presented our facts and the findings of the investmentation, and the judge determined there was probable cause and then you saw the results. We went and executed a search warrant and collected the information pursuant to that search warrant to continue our investigation. And that's what I want to harp on to your audience and the American people. These things take time, and it's not one of those matters where I'm saying trust us. I'm saying, look at the last year, under President Trump's leadership, what this DOJNFBI has done record levels of safety across America, and we are going after the worst the worst, including child predators, and our arrest on child predators and disrupting child predator networks are up anywhere from fifty to five hundred percent, depending on the category. So we're taking the same mindset to every kind of investigation. And that's what you saw unfold yesterday, the leadership of the DOJNFBI on the ground, going and presenting facts to a neutral and detached arbiter of justice, the judge who authorized the search warrant, and we collected more information. 00:04:55 Speaker 3: So, Director Patel, you know there was multiple truck loads materials, including boxes of ballots, physical ballots from twenty twenty, ballot images twenty twenty, voter rolls, tabulators, potentially tapes. What was the predicate for this? What can you tell us? You say it takes a lot of time to build this case. Is there any other granularity or details you can share with the audience. 00:05:21 Speaker 4: What we do is to safeguard the integrity of this investigation or any investigation, is apply for the search warrant, and then what we do is we speak through our public papers in court, and what we will do next over the course of time with the Department of Justice is moved to have the search warrant unsealed so that the American public can read whatever material that we put in there. Right now, that of course remains under sealed, so I can't discuss it. And also I want to highlight that we don't want to jeopardize any piece of this investigation by releasing information, not just prematurely, but we as officers of the court, are US attorneys and our FBI agents are responsible and committed under the law to abide by the parameters of the search warrant, and that's the rubric we're operating on it right now. So I think you'll see again, given the last year that we've had under President Trump, that we divulge information. We produce information to Congress and the public at record levels, and we're going to continue to do that. But we're not going to jeopardize the investigation yesterday with a big public spacing step. And you're right, you saw trucks, you saw material being removed, And what the FBI will do is now analyze that information, and we will take the next investigatory steps with our Department of Justice partners, the FBI, DOJ will run this investigation as we have every other investigation that has resulted in these record achievements for the president and under the President's leadership for America. 00:06:41 Speaker 3: What can you tell us about the timeline that we obviously understand, I hear you're harping on it. These things take time to develop. Is there any expectations about when we might get the next update on this case? Because this has generated a ton of interest and intrigue, as I'm sure you're aware, what's next? When can we what can we expect next? 00:07:03 Speaker 4: And that's and that's just it. You know, I can't predict where investigation is going to go. What we do best with our lawyers and our agents is gather the evidence, which we just did, which takes a monumental step to do so, and then we have to we have to look at it and see, Okay, now what do we got. Do we need more search warrants? Do we need to talk to more witnesses? Do we need to examine any other locations or pieces of evidence? And so that's going to unfold as we go through the evidence. But as you highlight it, it takes a minute to go through truckloads of evidence. And that's the next step. Once we go through that and we discuss the matter with Department of Justice and FBI personnel, then we'll make any next public facing steps for permitted without jeopardizing the investigation. So I just wanted to address that to say this has been a well thought out, methodical, predicated investigation and and and that's what we do here, and that's what the President wants us to do. Follow the facts in the law, and that's all we're doing here at DOJ and FBI. And we're just thankful that we have a great Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General and great FBI personnel who dedicated themselves not just this mission, but to the entire mission of keeping America safe. And that's what we're going to do. We're not going to change it for any type of investigation. The results speak for themselves, and the results after one year will hopefully give the American public confidence that we will handle this investigation no differently than any other. 00:08:31 Speaker 6: Director Patel, the Fulton County chairman, has been complaining that he says the ballots are no longer safe and secure because the FBI has them that they've lost. 00:08:43 Speaker 5: What do you have to say to that. 00:08:45 Speaker 4: The FBI is the world's premier law enforcement agency. We collect evidence from around the country and all over the world. We have facilities that store evidence, we have facilities that maintain the chain of custody. And for anybody to hint that this FBI or this Department of Justice is mishand evidence is just flat out political buffoonery. We will maintain the chain of custody, We will secure it like we always do, and we will make sure that we can use it to further any investigation. And most importantly, we will make sure that it is maintained under the rigors of the law so that we can use it in any future court proceedings that may rise out of any investigation. 00:09:23 Speaker 5: And that's kind of the last point. 00:09:25 Speaker 6: There is there any concern I was checking the statute of limitations on a lot of election fraud claims is five years, which we're basically right up against. Is there any concern about timeline on that or do they have they thought of ways they could extend that as that entered the calculus at all. 00:09:42 Speaker 4: You know, the calculus with the in terms of the statute is always for our brilliant attorneys at DOJ who we work in conjunction with, and we always abide by the statute limitations and any constitutional parameters that we have. But we were able to effectuate the search form in a time fashion legally and how to judge find make a finding of probable cause. So we did just that and that's where we are today. And look especially for you and your audience who have been such great supporters of law enforcement. I wish I could tell you more and hopefully the audience takes away the fact that after one year in the President Trump, it's no longer trust us. It's look at what we've done and we're going to continue to do the same thing here. 00:10:26 Speaker 3: Well, Director Patel, I know you got a dash and we just thank you for your time. But you guys have accomplished a lot with that top ten most wanted list. You're making massive progress there. Murders are down, crime is down, so we appreciate you making the time. We will wait on baited breath for updates on this case. As I know you know, Director Paatel, just how much this means to the base and President Trump supporters. 00:10:51 Speaker 5: Thank you again for your time. 00:10:52 Speaker 4: Thank you so much, and thanks to thank you and Erica in the entire Turning Point community, we really appreciate your support law enforcement. 00:10:58 Speaker 5: Thank you, God bless you. 00:11:02 Speaker 3: Hey guys, if you've been a faithful Kirk podcast listener for any amount of time, then you've probably already heard about strong Cell. It was Charlie's favorite supplement. If you want to deal with your brain fog, fatigue, lack of energy, or constant illness, then you have to try strong Sell. People always ask Charlie how he's able to keep his mind so sharp and his energy up, and strong Sell was his go to every day. I traveled the country with Charlie watching people ask him time and again if he really believed in strong Cell, and I loved watching him tell him. Yes, he loved it, and he used it, and he made us all believers too. Here at the Charlie Kirk Show. 00:11:36 Speaker 1: Strong Cell uses a proprietary delivery of any DH to make sure it goes straight to your cells to help your mitochondria. And since there are cells in every air of your body, then healthier cells equals a healthier you. 00:11:49 Speaker 3: And now you can try strong Cell completely risk free with their ninety day money back guarantee. That's right, completely risk free. 00:11:56 Speaker 5: To try that. 00:11:57 Speaker 1: Strong Sell dot Com forward slash Charlie, and don't forget to use special discount code Charlie at checkout to get a special twenty percent off just for Kirk listeners. Strong Sell dot Com Forward slash Charlie. Check it out right now. 00:12:15 Speaker 3: We are joined by Senator Mark Wayne Molin from the great state of Oklahoma. 00:12:19 Speaker 5: Senator, we have much to get to here. I like the hat. Senator, there you go. You're wrapping up so I love no. I love it. 00:12:30 Speaker 3: As a guy who comes from rancher Stock and Nevad I can appreciate. So we've got I'm looking at ABC right now, one of the monitors here, and it's saying that the Senate funding bill has run into a roadblock. Here we've got Schumer making demands about DHS and ICE. What can you tell us, Are we gonna have a shutdown on Saturday? 00:12:50 Speaker 7: No, So we knew this bill was going to fail, which is why you have seven Republicans has voted against it. We had probably had everybody on the bill but ran Paul if if we knew it was going to pass, but since it takes sixty votes, who wasn't going to get there. But we had to take this vote to bill to get on the bill to amend it. So this bill basically has to fill before we can amend it. We're going to amend it to five appropriation bills and then c R the DHS, which is a dumb move. Andrew for the for the Democrats, I can explain that if you want to get into it what this still actually does. So well, I'll finish the process. First, we're gonna we're going to we're gonna amend it to put five bills or to five appropriation bills where we'll do a CR. We're working on the timeframe on that. Democrats have asked for two weeks. We've asked for six weeks. CR will probably negotiate end up somewhere around four weeks, who knows, and then we're gonna. 00:13:47 Speaker 2: See r it. 00:13:48 Speaker 7: But what does what does a CR do? It's this is what's ridiculous, is a CR actually spends more money when DHS. We were actually cutting DHS by a pretty significant them out because the one big beautiful bill put so much money in DHS's account that they're able to move stuff around. So even if this goes into a shutdown, even if they even if they did shut down and we don't get a CR on DHS, it does nothing to keep ih ICE or DHS funded. It does nothing because they have enough money in their in their accounts from the one big beautiful bill to actually still pay the officers for almost four years. But what it does shut down is TSA agents, FEMA, shuts down the Seekert Service, and it shuts down the Coastguard. So the thing that they've literally planted their flag on does nothing. And even Paddy Murray, who's part of Democrat leadership, came out and said the same thing. 00:14:46 Speaker 5: Wow, so this is completely performative from the Democrats. They're making ICE. 00:14:51 Speaker 3: Yeah, they're making Ice their big boogeyman, and so they're lying in the sand. Isn't going to touch ICE, it's not going to touch DHS. It's going to harm Coastguard, FEMA and TSA. 00:15:01 Speaker 5: Oh that's really good. 00:15:02 Speaker 8: And a secret service. 00:15:03 Speaker 7: And by the way, because because the air traffic controllers allow and control international flights, it will affect them a little bit, not like it did during the forty three days shutdown, but it will affect air traffic controllers. 00:15:17 Speaker 4: Again. 00:15:17 Speaker 3: It's just so dysfunctional. I mean, you know, this whole ICE DHS fight. By the way, I want to give a shout out to porters ar Tom Homan. I thought he did a masterful job in his press conference this morning. I thought he set the right tone. He drew a line in the sand. He said, everybody's on the table if you're in this country illegally. So he's not budging on that, but I think from a messing messaging standpoint, he's you know, seems to have succeeded in getting local cooperation from state and local police departments. 00:15:45 Speaker 5: Uh, it's you know, Jacob Fry I. 00:15:47 Speaker 3: Think is doing a little bit of QZ dance with the language that he's not they're not enforcing immigration. 00:15:53 Speaker 5: Well, nobody's asking you to do that. 00:15:54 Speaker 3: Well, we would love love for you to do that, but that's not that that's not what we're talking about. When we have ICE agents and Border Patrol DHS that are under siege, that are getting attacked, we expect you to protect them because they're American citizens at your job, and secondly, we want you to hand over criminals uh, at your at your jails. So it sounds like Borders Homan has succeeded in getting concessions on those fronts. We'll see how it plays out. He even said, I'm not I'm no fool, I'm gonna stay here. 00:16:23 Speaker 5: We're not We're not. Yeah, but go ahead you can react to well. 00:16:26 Speaker 7: Mayor Frye came out and said that he's not there to enforce immigration lalls, federal immigration laws, which is absurd because if you start thinking about that, he doesn't get to pick and choose that it's a federal wall. 00:16:38 Speaker 8: Now, the city can have. 00:16:40 Speaker 7: Their own jurisdiction on what they're going to force on speed limits and what they consider petty crimes, how they want to handle, you know, homeless, how they want to handle robberies, how they can handle all that. But a federal law, they don't get the option to pick and choose. And so he actually has come out public and said that Now, Tom, Tom did a phenomenal job. 00:17:03 Speaker 8: I mean for a guy that I think sometimes he gets. 00:17:06 Speaker 7: Underestimated because the way he comes across, the guy was extremely articulate. He did as you said, Andrew set the exact tone that he needed to set. And he wasn't bringing up the temperature, but he wasn't backing up a step. 00:17:18 Speaker 2: But he was. He was, he was, he was. 00:17:20 Speaker 7: He was laying out the groundwork of what he's going to perceive moving forward, and he's expecting cooperation. And you're absolutely correct. I thought he did a really really good job. 00:17:31 Speaker 5: Well. And and here's the point. 00:17:33 Speaker 3: We nobody wants people dying, although we've seen now clips of this Alex pretty guy who's kicking tail lights, spitting on ice officers and saying, you know, come on, mf r's assault me. I mean, complete antagonist here, a real peach, a real real peach. Obviously, we don't want anybody to die, but you know, they're bringing down the temperature. I support that, I suppose, as long as we don't budge off the line that all of these people are subject to deportation. 00:18:02 Speaker 5: But this is the point. Go ahead, Yes, well. 00:18:05 Speaker 7: I was gonna say, Andrew, they're blaming DHS on this. DHS has been in the cities all across the United States working and this has only happened in Minneapolis. 00:18:13 Speaker 8: Why is it happened in Minneapolis. It's because of Minneapolis leadership. 00:18:17 Speaker 7: It's not DHS. DHS hasn't changed their tactics. If they want to do something about law enforcement needs to start start cooperating with DHS. Listen, we did it right here in Washington, d C. We're ninety over ninety percent of the population Washington, d C voted Democrat. You couldn't get a more liberal city than Washington, d C. And even the mayor of Washington d C came in and thanked President Trump for putting Ice on the street and putting. 00:18:44 Speaker 8: And putting the National Guard our streets. 00:18:47 Speaker 7: And then when you start seeing what happened in Memphis, which seems in New Orleans, what you've seen in Saint Louis, which even in Chicago you didn't see this kind of rhetoric take place. 00:18:56 Speaker 2: This is happening because because. 00:18:58 Speaker 7: Minneapolis leadership is refusing to cooperate and actually working against DHS. If they were doing their job, Listen, Ice wouldn't even be on the streets. Ice would simply be showing up at the detention centers which Tom was talking about, and picking up the criminals that they were getting off their streets. 00:19:15 Speaker 2: So if they if. 00:19:15 Speaker 7: They want Ice off the streets and say you're going to enforce federal law. If you're saying you're not going to enforce federal law, then the federal government is obbligated to do so. 00:19:25 Speaker 3: Yeah, and I think they're hiding behind some some pretty well established sanctuary city precedent here, and you know what they consider established legal precedent. I completely agree. I think sanctuary cities are an abomination. They need to be outlawed. But what the fine print to begin with? I completely agree, But what they are, what they they distinguish between not impeding versus cooperating not enforced at you. So, so now Tom Homan was saying that they're going to get the concession is that they're going to hand over illegals that have a detention request for so they're going to out of some of their jails. So we'll see if that happens. It's as simple as that, though, because everybody gives Obama all this credit for all these deportations, well, truth be told, about eighty percent of the deportations under Obama were just handovers. They just handled them off at the jails because we didn't have this militarized, aggressive sanctuary city culture during the Obama years. And plus he's a Democrat, so they cooperated. I want to get really quickly because Blake and I were talking about this in the break and that was the Save Act. We had a big movement here where Senator Thune. Leader Thune is now saying he's in favor of it. You are the co author, I believe of this bill. But is this Can this get us over the finish line? I mean, I know it's going back to the House, it's getting edited, it's getting amended. 00:20:47 Speaker 5: Can we get enough? 00:20:48 Speaker 4: Yeah? 00:20:49 Speaker 6: I mean no bus Is there any hope for this would send whatever the filibuster to pass it? 00:20:55 Speaker 4: Yeah? 00:20:55 Speaker 7: So, first of all, Blake, you should try a cowboy hat. It wouldn't hurt. Sorry, man, I give you a hard time. The second all, Food was always for it. He just wasn't out in front. You got to remember he's got to be he's got to walk a delegate line because he has to represent everybody in our conference, and so he never wants to get out in front of our conference. It took a little bit of back and forth over you think the majority of our conference would sponsor this just like this. It didn't happen that way. We had to go through some of the process to get there. The only way I think this gets over the finish line Andrew is if if he would probably have to do in the fact that we've got rid of the filibuster in some form, I don't think we could ever get sixty votes on this. Now you could see where the political wind may change. But the Democrats are you know, they wouldn't want anybody to have to have any idea to vote. They want anybody to show up and not even have to prove that they're even live in the district or in the precinct, or they're a US citizen. 00:22:01 Speaker 2: They building. 00:22:02 Speaker 5: Yeah, I totally agree. What would what? 00:22:04 Speaker 3: So if we're going because I've seen it floated that there, you know, the nuke and the filibuster for appropriations or funding bills, is there an is there something you could do in a limited window that maybe Thune would find palatable? You know, maybe it's about immigration or voting integrity. If is there some category that you could exempt. 00:22:23 Speaker 7: I think it's more likely to be on funding. Remember, we did this with judges, so this isn't new in twenty seventeen. They we with Mitch McConnell. We did it for the judges. We also changed the rules in nineteen seventy five, we changed them in nineteen seventeen, we changed them in eighteen oh seven, so the Senate it can change it. 00:22:41 Speaker 2: If we were to do it, it would have. 00:22:42 Speaker 7: To go through funding because there would be funding that would be that would have to be uh made available for it, because we'd have to work with the states to get the proper ID for them to do it, or it'd had to be a real ID. My argument is is I don't think it would cost us one dollar because the real ID is already consider it a federal ID. So as long as you had a photo ID that was a real idea that was a driver's icens or an ID that you get, I think it works. But more likely this would be part of a funding bill which could take place, possibly when we start doing fy f y twenty seven, which is because FY twenty six is almost over. We've got all the propriation bills. I mean, the House is already did all twelve on which is amazing for them to do. We're about ready to do eleven, have only one holdover F y twenty seven. If we were find ourselves lead into a shutdown before the primary, this could absolutely be part of the part of the discussion, it would be to drop the filibuster on appropriations and then the Save Act could be part of it. 00:23:43 Speaker 5: So just to be clear, would that be in time for the midterms. 00:23:47 Speaker 7: Depends on how it was written, because technically yes, because the f y twenty six funding runs out September thirtieth, so we start the new physical year October first, So if we did it in September thirtieth, that is more than enough time for the November election. 00:24:06 Speaker 2: Have to have availability to do it. Now. 00:24:09 Speaker 7: There's a lot of what is and it's Andrew, because it would have to be. The Democrats are moving us to a shutdown. So if they're moving us to a shutdown to avoid a shutdown, repul timing is the most important thing we could ever have because moving to a shutdown would be devastating for us in the midterm, so there would be a lot of people that want to avoid that. So that's when the film of us are narrowly changing for appropriations only could work. 00:24:35 Speaker 3: Hi, folks, Andrew Colvett here, I'd like to tell you about my friends over at why REFY. You've probably been hearing me talk about why REFI for some time now, We are all in with these guys. If you or someone you know is struggling with private student loan debt, take my advice and give them a call. Maybe you're behind on your payments, maybe you're even in default. You don't have to live in this nightmare anymore. Why Refi will pro you a custom payment based on your ability to pay. They tailor each loan individually. They can save you thousands of dollars and you can get your life back. We go to campuses all over America and we see student after student who's drowning in private student loan debt. Many of them don't even know how much they owe. Y ref I can help. Just go to y refi dot com. That's the letter why then refi dot com And remember y Refi doesn't care what your credit score is. Just go to yrefi dot com and tell them your friend Andrews sent you. We're gonna move quick here with Senator Molan, I want to I want to finish this last thought. Uh though, just before we move on to the next topic. Would the States then sue so say we get it in this appropriate or the funding bill starting October one? I mean, that's that's like a month before midterms, would they sue? 00:25:53 Speaker 5: I mean what, this could get very messy. 00:25:56 Speaker 7: Well, and they could because melon balance or voting, some of that starts prior to that. So they I think they probably could. We could get into litigation. You know, the Democrats immediately would put a stay. They'd get some liberal guy on a bench. 00:26:11 Speaker 8: That would put a stay on it. 00:26:13 Speaker 2: But I don't. 00:26:15 Speaker 7: I think you could tighten the language up enough that you could move it forward prior that happening. 00:26:21 Speaker 1: Uh. 00:26:22 Speaker 7: There's a lot to this, Andrew, because we for instance, mail out ballots need to go out forty five days before the election for the for deployed troops. Uh and so, but they're they honestly had the right to vote. So the the thing you could do it on is in person voting or when you walk in two hand the ballot. 00:26:42 Speaker 2: Some of the stuff would be litigated through. 00:26:44 Speaker 3: That be a mess but I think listen, I think it's I think it's worth having that fight. Let's get messy. Yeah right, you know, Okay, Senator, We're gonna move on here. Trump accounts. President Trump did a big thing about this. Why I want to make it a big thing? Turning point has for our staff and turningsa turning point action is going to be contributing one thousand dollars to all newborn kids from our staff. 00:27:05 Speaker 5: By the way, we got which We've got a buzz a bunch of. 00:27:07 Speaker 3: Pregnant ladies running around here, so like this is gonna be an expensive promise. Erica Kirk announced this, and why I love this is we have this clip from Charlie. I went and dug through and found it this morning because I was supposed to do a Fox and Friends hit myself about it got push because of the home and thing. But Charlie loved this idea for thirty six. 00:27:26 Speaker 1: This could change the game and make people capitalists at age seven. I could imagine a bunch of nine and ten year olds being like, hey, our stock is up today. By the way, if you win a spelling bee, they could be like, hey, I'm gonna put twenty five bucks into your Invest America account if you win a sports championship. It's a way where moms, dads, grandfathers, companies, employers, you can tokenize this where kids can actually then save their entire childhood and have something to point forward to and be co owners in America, not just renters. 00:27:58 Speaker 3: You're a capitalist, you're a busys its owner. How big of a of a move is this? What a great idea? Charlie loved it. Tell us about tell us about it. 00:28:06 Speaker 2: I think it's huge. 00:28:07 Speaker 7: You know, my son just got married and then over the holidays we got he'd said that he was I say, just got married. He got married before Thanksgiving, but then over the holidays they said they had a a unexpected pregnancy. 00:28:16 Speaker 4: Right. 00:28:17 Speaker 7: And most kids, when they get younger, or when they get married younger, I say young kids. My kids are younger, but they don't have money to put in a savings count. And if you can imagine, you put a thousand dollars in, and if you don't put another penny in, and you keep that set there invested until you're able to draw social Security, you have over two million dollars in it, and your payment will be more than social Security. So not only are is the president saying, hey, social security isn't actually the best idea for just retirement, but let's go ahead and set them up for success. But God forbid, something happens when you're eighteen, nineteen twenty, or twenty five or thirty and you have to grab it because of some unexpected ordeal. 00:28:57 Speaker 2: It gives you and it gives you the ability to have some going. 00:29:00 Speaker 7: To fall back on when most people, especially young people, they don't have a nest egg to fall back on. This is this allows you to make choices for your future and it learns and it teaches you how to be responsible. We did the same thing with our kids, my wife and I. We didn't have kids until we're later. Then they wouldn't stop and you know, we end up with six kids. 00:29:18 Speaker 2: But the but we. 00:29:20 Speaker 7: Started investing in an account for them. My twenty two year old Sunday day, it called me about buying additional stock to invest in his account that he already has because he doesn't want to touch it because he sees it growing. That's that's a lot. There's a lot of ownership inside this. And of course leave it up to President Trump, who's a business guy. Charlie Kirk, who's a business guy that can see the future in this. When you know Democrats, you know they can't argue against it, but I bet you they would if they could. 00:29:49 Speaker 5: If they could. Yeah, you know, it's crazy about this though. 00:29:52 Speaker 3: Charlie was all about making sure the next generation wasn't radicalized, wasn't just I mean, he wanted them to have skin in the game in America, investors in America. So this is a way to do it. So if you fully fund one of these accounts, so you get a thousand dollars seed money, and then you fund it with parents, grandparents, spelling Beast Championship philanthropists, which is five thousand dollars a year by the time they're twenty one. According to SMP trends, over the years, it could be worth between four hundred and five hundred thousand dollars for a twenty one year old. And get this, if you hold the principal till twenty eight it because of compound interest, because then you're really gaining momentum. It could be worth one point nine million dollars. They have at one point zero nine, but I looked it up. The Treasury has it up to one point nine. This is this is a huge, huge potential. I don't know, Blake, if you want to win this. 00:30:39 Speaker 6: I'm just thinking about how in eighteen years we might have some irresponsible people like blowing their Trump money on one thing like card and they'll make a stupid video game post about it. Yeah, there'll be the split between people who blew their money and people who used it responsibly. 00:30:55 Speaker 7: Wella like, here's the thing on that is when the first time most people go bust, they go bankrupt, they learn from it, and so when they waste money like that, the next time they start accumulating it. Because if you've done it once, sometimes you feel like you can do it again. There's motivation to do it again because you know it's possible. When you don't know what's possible, you don't know what starts to reach towards. And so even those that fail because they go you blow it on something stupid, that'll be a life lesson at twenty eight rather than at fifty eight. 00:31:26 Speaker 3: Center last topic, and then we got two minutes here, so I gotta go quick. Four sixty one, Bruce Springsteen comes out the new song and I just I'm so infuriated by it. 00:31:36 Speaker 5: For sixty one they stand. 00:31:40 Speaker 6: For this land and the strange angel miss remember name those down. 00:31:50 Speaker 5: On the streets, is. 00:31:54 Speaker 2: All right? 00:31:55 Speaker 3: So he says he's gonna they've been roaming and killing, and they're gonna remember the names of Renee Good and Alex Pretty, the people who died and I, and it just occurs to me, what about, where's the song for Jocelyn Nungary, where's the where's the song for Rachel Moore? And where's the song for Lake and Riley? The selective outrage just absolutely infuriates me, and I'm so ticked off about it because it's just pure propaganda. 00:32:19 Speaker 7: I didn't know Bruce was still relevant. He's not, so I don't really care. I mean, the guy is so ridiculous. He doesn't represent any values that the that the America bleedes in today, and so to me, I never never liked his songs anyways, He's just every even more irrelevant to me. 00:32:37 Speaker 4: Now. 00:32:37 Speaker 5: Blake's a huge I'm a big hit now, I'm a big hater. 00:32:40 Speaker 6: No, it's just it's it shows that they very much have They all just really wish it was still nineteen sixty two. 00:32:48 Speaker 5: They all want to be. 00:32:49 Speaker 6: Writing protest anthems to overthrow Jim Crow. And the truth is, we got rid of that a half century ago, thank goodness. 00:32:56 Speaker 5: Would you call it civil rights? It's like. 00:33:00 Speaker 6: Right, some but yeah, it's like we got rid of that more than half a century ago, thank goodness. And they've just been trying to recapture it ever since. And it comes at the cost of just labeling America an evil country, which it's clearly not. 00:33:10 Speaker 3: In our brave men and women and ICE man, I just think that is such a tough job. Screw this guy, honestly, absolutely garbage. 00:33:20 Speaker 8: So I mean you're upset that ICE is doing their job. 00:33:25 Speaker 7: I mean they're literally doing their job. They're enforcing federal law, and you're upset by that. I don't I don't understand it, but I think absolutely. 00:33:32 Speaker 3: Senator Mark Waynemullan from the great state of Oklahoma, thank you, Senator, we have your back. Well, we'll talk to you again soon. 00:33:41 Speaker 5: For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to Charliekirk dot com.