Iran Deal Details + The Mexico Menace

00:00:03 Speaker 1: My name is Charlie kirk I run the largest pro American student organization in the country, fighting for the future of our republic. My call is to fight evil and to proclaim truth. If the most important thing for you is just feeling good, you're gonna end up miserable. But if the most important thing is doing good, you'll end up purposeful. College is a scam, everybody. You got to stop sending your kids to college. 00:00:27 Speaker 2: You should get married as. 00:00:28 Speaker 1: Young as possible and have as many kids as possible. Go start at turning point. You would say college chapter. Go start at turning point, yould say high school chapter. Go find out how your church can get involved. Sign up and become an activist. 00:00:39 Speaker 3: I gave my. 00:00:39 Speaker 1: Life to the Lord in fifth grade, most important decision I ever made in my life, and I encourage you. 00:00:44 Speaker 4: To do the same. 00:00:45 Speaker 1: Here I am Lord, Use me. Buckle up, everybody, Here we go. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirkshaw, a company that specializes in gold iras and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegold investments dot Com. That is Noblegoldinvestments dot Com. 00:01:17 Speaker 5: All Right, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show. It's May twenty eighth, twenty twenty six. We're here in Phoenix, Arizona, at the y REFI Studios. 00:01:24 Speaker 3: How we doing, Blake, We're doing lovely. Yep. 00:01:26 Speaker 5: We got news this morning that broke from Axios and it's a potentially massive, massive deal and that is the US and Iran reach deal for a sixty day piece ceasefire, but need Trump's final approval. Official say, So, the way this has gone down is that you got to understand, dealing with Iran is very very difficult. 00:01:49 Speaker 3: Right now. 00:01:50 Speaker 5: They got carrier pigeons going to their supreme leader. It's tough to get word back and forth. So if you're if you're you know, quibbling over a dot on an eye or. 00:01:59 Speaker 3: A how a tee is? 00:02:00 Speaker 5: It takes roughly about three days to get that back and forth. Okay, so they say that Iran. Iran has not officially confirmed this, but US officials are saying that Iranian senior leadership have said that they have approval to sign this deal. So what's in the deal. The deal says that the Strait will be opened Okay, the blockade will be lifted, Iran will not harash the shipping lane, and the US will end its blockade. So this will happen in proportion of the restoration of commercial shipping. A US official said the MoU will include an Iranian commitment not to pursue a nuclear weapon. The official said it will also state that the first issue to be negotiated in this sixty day window will be how to dispose of Iran's highly enriched uranium and how to address Iranian enrichment. Okay, so let's just set out the stakes here for you. So got to get that shipping lane open, right, We've got midterms, we got high energy prices. There is pressure politically domestically to get that gas price under three dollars nationally. Okay, this would put us on the road to do that. Okay, Yeah, we are net exporting, We have all this energy in the United States. These are all good things. China's coming to US, lots of others are coming to US. Venezuela sending US ten million barrels of oil. All those things are good developments. But internationally, you have to understand there's still a pressure on that gas price, on the energy prices, and that has a political consequence. You better believe it that the President is keenly aware of this. Yes, he's willing to endure some pain here, but he's also a pragmatist. Okay, President Trump wants a few days to think about this, but that blockade would be lifted. Iran would agree to allow the Straight to be open. This would help them economically. There's no question estimates having at about five hundred million dollars a day that Iranians are losing by not being able to access the Straight for shipping of energy internationally. Also, they have a lot of worry about their wells backing up. Once that happened, some of those oil wheels cannot be reopened. You do permanent damage to those wells. And the first item up forbids during this sixty eight piece fire will be how to deal with and dispose of the dust, the nuclear dust that's there now. 00:04:19 Speaker 3: That is open for interpretation. 00:04:20 Speaker 5: There's a lot of different parties involved, a lot of different ideas of how to best do it. Some say China, some say Russia. President Trump says that's off the table. I think President Trump wants a few days to think about this because he wants the US to directly oversee the disposal of said nuclear waste. 00:04:36 Speaker 6: It's not a perfect deal. It's not fun to say that the whole war is the whole thing is not perfect. In truth, a lot of this is it would be getting us back to the situation before the war, which is straight open free trade and we're agreeing to negotiate on the nuclear issue, which we were negotiating when the strikes starts. 00:04:54 Speaker 5: So just to be clear, though, what is different is that they have apparently in this is part of the background that I have been, you know, exposed to on some of these calls. The difference right now is that they have finally conceded that they will not have a nuclear program and that they're willing to dispose of said nuclear. 00:05:14 Speaker 7: Iran has always said they're not planning to build a nuclear weapson. We don't believe them, of. 00:05:18 Speaker 5: Course, so well, there is some interesting insight on that. One school of thought, one theory of the case is that the old Supreme leader was never going to do it. 00:05:27 Speaker 3: He just wanted to posture. 00:05:29 Speaker 5: He just wanted to When we got rid of him, the new leadership for a while was actually willing to do it, so actually things got more risky in the immediate aftermath. Right now it appears that the moderates are ascended. So let me explain the breakdown. 00:05:43 Speaker 8: Here. 00:05:44 Speaker 5: You get rid of the leadership structure and it creates a vacuum. You've got moderates, you've got hardliners. There has been dust ups in the last couple of days. There were some last night. We shot down some drones. We shot down a drone because. 00:05:55 Speaker 6: It just stole the case where they have straight it's decentralized exactly. 00:06:00 Speaker 3: So here's the deal. 00:06:02 Speaker 5: So when you have a power vacuum, and when you have the Supreme Leader, who is essentially the leader, but he's new. First of all, he's injured and he's in hiding, the communication channels are dispersed, and there are factions fighting within the emergent Iranian leadership structure that want to dominate. The hardliners want to dominate, and they want to sabotage this deal. There was a piece that came out, I believe, in the Financial Times yesterday that explained how the hardliners are already trying to sabotage this deal. Do you want to know how we know this is a good deal for the United States because the hardliners in Iran want to sabotage it. They understand that this emboldens, empowers, enables the moderates to take the reigns of power and to put Iran on a better course economically where they're not going to get overthrown by their people in about six months. But maybe that still happens, okay, because there's been a ton of damage inflicted upon the Iranian people, and if they want to do that, if they want to seize their own destiny and their own futures, they should do that. 00:06:59 Speaker 3: They should feel in powered to do that. 00:07:00 Speaker 5: I would be pro the Iruni people overthrowing this tyrannical regime. They're evil. Should that be the United States job? That's an open question. I don't believe it should be our job. We have a country to run right here at home. But President Trump was very clear, he said no nuclear weapon. This deal takes that off off the board. Why because for the first time, the moderates have been empowered to take control of the regime. They have been empowered in our advancing this notion that finally they are conceding that they cannot have a nuclear weapon. This is a good, good development. This is a slam dunk development. 00:07:39 Speaker 6: You get the sense, You get the sense of again how complicated it is, because have you ever heard of any of these people before any of this happened. I've got the Financial Times piece open. Influential members of the ultra conservative Paidari faction who occupy seats in Parliament and prominent positions at the state broadcasters, have insisted around retain control over the Strait and refused to make concessions over its nuclear probe, describing these as red lines we've heard that were before. They have criticized Parliamentary Speaker Muhammed Bager Galibaf, a longtime political rival who has been leading the negotiations, claiming he has acted beyond the mandate given by unseen new Supreme leader Ayatola Motaba Kameni. So you really sense how incredibly complicated it is where each different factions in one country that we're in conflict with are claiming they have the true mandate of a leader no one. 00:08:29 Speaker 7: Can see, no one's heard from. 00:08:31 Speaker 3: And again very dramatic to underscore this point. 00:08:34 Speaker 5: To underscore this point, there have this guy in hiding, like incredibly hidden within this country to the point that they will not establish a digital connection in any way, shape or form around this guy. So when I say carrier pigeon, I'm joking, but I'm kind of not joking. That's what it takes to communicate with this guy. And you know, we have to assume since he hasn't been taken out, that he's probably hidden successfully. 00:09:01 Speaker 3: Right. 00:09:01 Speaker 5: So there, when you have a situation like that where you can't get on a broadcast and dictate the terms or send out messaging in some other way to his lieutenants, then there is gonna be this vacuum, this void created. What the US has challenged right now is to say our red line is nuclear, our red line is the Strait. Okay, if you concede on those two points, we will let you open up and give you some financial lease, very health, energy, and from sanctions. 00:09:26 Speaker 4: It is very. 00:09:26 Speaker 6: Helpful when you have the Iranians themselves saying anything short of exclusive Iranian control of the Strait is Iran is a total loser and the US a total winner. 00:09:35 Speaker 3: So here's the deal. 00:09:37 Speaker 5: We've got hardliners on our side as well here at home. So and Blake, I know you're very cognizant of this we both were watching. There's certain people. I'm not gonna name all of them, but some of them are my friends and some of them are not my friends. But let's just use Lindsay Graham as a stand in for all of them. Lady Graham, Lady Graham. So these people will not be happy until we just all we do is drop bombs all over foreign countries and you know, perpetually send American troops. 00:10:09 Speaker 3: They saw they. 00:10:10 Speaker 6: Saw this escalation as their big chance to divert President Trump into a full regime change war. 00:10:17 Speaker 7: Whatever. 00:10:17 Speaker 6: They told him, Oh, they'll cave, they'll get rid of their nuclear programming media. They believe this would be their chance to get their hook in and get President Trump to just do a full Iraq overthrow the government. 00:10:28 Speaker 7: And they still do this. 00:10:29 Speaker 6: They say, ten thousand troops, it's gonna be super easy, in and out, in and out, President Trump. 00:10:34 Speaker 5: Let's just be very clear about something. For those of you and the audience that maybe do feel a bit that way, where you want to see the regime topple, I'm the same I want to see the regime topple, but I'm not willing to send American boots on the ground to get that done, and that's essentially the only thing that we'll get this done. You could arm the citizenry of Iran, but potentially that would be effective, and maybe they should pursue that. That usually ends terribly as well. Let's just be honest, we don't have a great track record there. But unless you are willing to commit one hundred thousand boots on the ground to go commander and wrench control of that country from the regime, then this is not gonna happen. And I will tell you right now if President Trump did that, it would be politically disastrous. Every toss up race we would lose every single one of them come the midterms, he would be impeached. The entire last two years of his presidency would be completely and utterly distracted, and every wrench would be thrown into every gear you can imagine. Okay, So that's just like, let's just be very clear about the stakes here, and so in lieu of getting full regime change and getting everything that you want, getting them to give up their nuclear getting them to commit to disposing of the dust, getting them to allow American officials forces oversee the disposal of said nuclear material, and getting them to open the straights up and destroying their entire missile arsenal, sinking their navy to the bottom of the sea. This is this is the deal that is possible. So let's deal in the realm of real. 00:12:10 Speaker 6: It's just a simple fact. Would it be good for a ran to have a different type of government? Yes, But is that what President Trump ran on in twenty twenty four? 00:12:18 Speaker 3: No? 00:12:18 Speaker 7: Is it what the people who voted for him want? It doesn't seem so. 00:12:22 Speaker 3: No. 00:12:23 Speaker 7: And is it overall? 00:12:24 Speaker 6: Is it good for America to a country that has fewer resources than it did twenty years ago for this sort of thing? Is this a good way for us to be investing in America's focus and assets. I don't believe it is. You don't believe it is. I don't think most people believe it is. What we want is we want to revive middle class, We want a revived industrial base, we want strength abroad. 00:12:46 Speaker 5: Family formation, affordability, home ownership. 00:12:49 Speaker 3: These are the. 00:12:50 Speaker 5: Things that people voted for President Trump. But do you want to know ultimately why people voted for President Trump? It was Yes, it was immigration certainly that motivated me, But really it is that they felt the economy was better under Trump than it was under Biden. 00:13:03 Speaker 3: That's it. 00:13:04 Speaker 5: I hate to be that guy, the economy stupid, but it's kind of that, okay, And right now this is a drag on fulfilling that promise. They'd looked at President Trump and you could look at a thousand different videos online, probably half of them are from Charlie, the Peace President, the no New Wars president. 00:13:22 Speaker 3: That's what they want. They want domestic focus. 00:13:25 Speaker 6: Ultimately, it was just they thought, oh, it seems like things were better under Trump because Biden took over and you could just see the decay everywhere because he let crime go haywire, he let the border go haywire, he let prices go haywire, and that was a big post COVID effect. And we're seeing a similar drag here where the long term effect of that straight of horror moves. It's not just on gas prices. It's that a bunch of factories in Vietnam and Thailand and India and China, those all slow down their operations, so you get those shortages that we had during COVID, and then that drives inflation in prices of other things. 00:13:56 Speaker 3: It's a whole slow motion effect effects and you. 00:13:59 Speaker 6: Don't undo that until you restore that Middle East choke point back to what it was. 00:14:05 Speaker 5: But lest you be concerned that Trump is going to sign some bad deal, he's not. This is a step by step process that's being negotiated here. Okay, you make good on the first promise, then we give a little bit. You make good on another promise, we give a little bit. But if you don't, President Trumps still holds the Trump carved that we're going to keep our military assets deployed out there until we have exactly what we need and what we want to twenty seven. 00:14:31 Speaker 4: Well, I think we're doing very well. 00:14:33 Speaker 9: They are starting to give us the things that they have to give us, and if they do, that's great. And if they won't, then the man on my left is going to finish him off. 00:14:41 Speaker 5: And the man on his left is Secretary of warpete hexat all right. So he's not changing his posture. He's saying, listen, carrot and a stick. Here's the carrot if you do what we want, and here's the stick if you don't do what we want. 00:14:53 Speaker 3: All right. So we still hold the leverage in that sense, all right. 00:14:57 Speaker 5: So he's also being very clear that the Strait is going to be open, be accessible to everybody. 00:15:01 Speaker 3: It's not twenty one now, the. 00:15:02 Speaker 9: Strait's going to be open to everybody. It's it's international waters. Nobody's going to control it. We're gonna watch over it. We'll watch over it, but nobody's going to control and that's part of the negotiation that we have. They would like to control it. Nobody's going to control. It's international waters, and oman will behave just like everybody else. So will have to blow them up. They understand that they'll be fine. 00:15:26 Speaker 3: So listen. 00:15:27 Speaker 5: I hope the stakes are very clear for you, because it's very clear to me that there you are not going to get the full regime change unless you commit boots on the ground, and that ain't happening. What you can get is you can you can exert leverage with the blockade, which we've been doing, and leverage with our aerial offensive which we've been doing. And you can get them to give up the nuclear and you can get them to open the straight. If you can do those things, you take that deal. 00:15:51 Speaker 3: Every day of the week you get out, you declare victory. 00:15:54 Speaker 5: You just avoided nuclear fallout in the Middle East and Europe and elsewhere. Okay, a good deal. Trust the president in this. He's not going to take a bad deal. But this is the right deal to take, and we should get out. Charlie used to talk a lot about Angel Studios and what they were building, and as you know, I've been a longtime fan of it for the same reason. So I want to share some of my favorite films and shows on Angel, and I put them all into one easy to use watch list. This is content that's actually worth your time, not just noise or recycled talking points, but stories that go a level deeper and ask better questions. That's what stands out about Angel to me. They're willing to put out films and documentaries that don't just follow the usual script, especially when it comes to politics, culture, and the bigger conversations you and I should be having. So on my watch list you'll find picks that lean into those topics, but there are also solid options for family or just something meaningful to watch at the end of a stressful day. If you want to check it out, go to Angel dot com slash Charlie and take a look at the watch list I put together. All right, I want to bring in Senator Eric Schmidt, who's one of the good guys fighting for us in the Senate, and I got to just kind of start there. We got to get to Iran, and it's important. But I mean, the Senate had a big week this week and it feels like, listen, I know these are your colleagues, so you got to be diplomatic. You feel free to be diplomatic. I'm going to read the subtext just kidding. I so, but we're seeing new fighters emerge and I'm we're totally behind Ken Paxton. But what do you make of the big takeaways there in Texas, Sir? That you saw the base kind of rise up, you saw this endorsement from President Trump and it ended up being a blowout. 00:17:40 Speaker 10: Yeah, I think that. 00:17:42 Speaker 11: Look, I've known this for a very very long time when I went through and ran for the Senate in twenty twenty two. 00:17:48 Speaker 10: You know, people want fighters right now. 00:17:50 Speaker 11: They want to know that people are committed to President Trump's agenda. And that's that's what I focus on every single day. I know that's what the people in Missouri expect me to do, and that's where my heart is. And I think we've got so many opportunities still in front of us, even with the time in these you know, before the midterms, to continue to push an agenda for there's a lot of things we've done, but there's still more to do. And I think it's also guys the voters want to know. And I saw this as Attorney general in Missouri before I came to the Senate, that you understand what time it is. You know, like this is not your grandfather's Democrat Party of Harry Truman or Ted Kennedy reaching across the aisle to Bob Dole. These guys are obsessed with power and control. They've been captured by the radical left. If they had their way, they'll open up the borders all over again. 00:18:36 Speaker 10: They'll censor us all over again. They'll pack the Supreme. 00:18:39 Speaker 11: Court, they'll add states to the Union, they'll federalize elections, all of it. 00:18:42 Speaker 10: They will do all of it. 00:18:44 Speaker 11: And so I think you got to understand the stakes, and you've got to be willing to fight back. 00:18:47 Speaker 10: And and I just. 00:18:48 Speaker 11: Can tell you my experience here in Missouri. I'm home this week talking to voters around the state. That's what they want us to do. They love this country. These are common sense people. They just want us to fight for them. 00:18:59 Speaker 3: Amen. 00:19:00 Speaker 5: All right, So one of the big developments here is this Iranian piece deal. We just got news that were at the finish line. Basically both sides of the negotiating table have agreed to it. President Trump's going to take a couple of days to think about it. What do you hope happens here, Senator Schmidt, Well. 00:19:16 Speaker 11: Look, we've accomplished what President Trump set out to do, what he said he wanted to do, which was to knock back their nuclear ambitions, to knock back their military. 00:19:24 Speaker 10: He's done that, and it's created this space now. 00:19:26 Speaker 11: For diplomacy, and I'm hopeful, I'm hopeful that President Trump can strike a deal. I know he's not going to strike a bad deal. This is not Barack Obama at the negotiating table. This is the ultimate deal maker who understands the stakes. He's been clear that he doesn't want them to have a nuclear weapon, and so I have full confidence that President Trump is gonna, you know, do. 00:19:46 Speaker 10: What's right for the American people. 00:19:47 Speaker 11: But I think, as north Star here has always been to give an opportunity for these negotiations to play out, to have a resolution and That's what I'm hoping for here. 00:19:58 Speaker 5: I mean, I think this is a like moment for the president. If you could stop their nuclear program and get that straight back open, prices come down, gas prices below three dollars average nationally. I mean California will still be like six bucks. But you know whatever, that's their own problem. I think this is a huge legacy moment and the president's right to pursue peace. He is the piece through strength President, and I'm praying for peace. I'll be honest with you. I think it's a huge, huge impediment to the midterms. We get this done where we got big mo behind us. You got look Indiana, you got Paxton, you got a bunch. It gets a VRA section two being got it something I want to talk about with you. You have raised an interesting issue with California. If we want to talk about California, so they redistrict their maps, they get about five seats for the Democrats. You have raised that there might be some problems based on the Supreme Court ruling. 00:20:52 Speaker 3: Centator, what's your perspective there? 00:20:53 Speaker 11: Yeah, I think this is an underreported story just how significant this case was at the Supreme Court about a month ago. Effectively, what they said is the Democrats can't rely on this AstroTurf you know number of seats they have by way of racist maps. You can't racially jerrymender maps. And the Democrats have been doing this for a very very long time. And so I've encouraged the Department of Justice to go after states like California, Illinois that have been very explicit as. 00:21:21 Speaker 10: To why their rationale for why they have the maps that they have. 00:21:25 Speaker 11: California has this commission that they created, which by the way, was set up under the guise of nonpartisanship to make it more democratic maps. 00:21:34 Speaker 10: Now that's not. 00:21:35 Speaker 11: Radical enough for them. They want to toss that and get to another system. But be that as it may. Their chief map maker has been cleared that they created districts based on race. And so for me, Dylan, the Department of Justice, we've issued a letter to them, encouraged them to sue the state of California and up end a racist map, and they ought to do it in Illinois too. Illinois sets up in their statue criteria that's based explicitly on race. The Supreme Court's been clear you can't do that, and I think what we're about to see that if you zoom out here, Andrew, if we are successful in that effort. The Democrats have relied on illegal immigrants patting their numbers, were successful with deportations. 00:22:13 Speaker 10: You do that. 00:22:13 Speaker 11: And then also just the natural redistricting that's going to happen. Twenty twenty was a bogus census. The twenty thirty census will be more accurate. And also the people leaving California, Illinois, New York for red states. You're going to see a fundamental shift I think structurally where we're going to have advantages in states in a big way in the next five years. But we ought to be aggressive here. We ought to do pedal to the medal and up end these racist maps. That's what Supreme Court ruling is all about. 00:22:39 Speaker 10: And now they should play offense. 00:22:41 Speaker 3: I love this. 00:22:42 Speaker 5: I mean, so have you gotten any word back from the DOJ that they're actually going to pursue this? And I want to remind the audience here. You are the former attorney general of the state of Missouri. You are the guy that led the fight against Google and censorship. We have so many scalps thanks to your leadership, and so you know this well, I mean, you are a legal bagle in the truest sense. You happen to be in the Senate now and you're fighting the fight for us. But like I just want the audience to understand when you when you bring up these legal issues, you're not talking into a vacuum. You're not talking unaware about the legal precedents that have been set. Have you gotten confirmation that they're looking into it, that this is that that they agree with your prescription here? 00:23:22 Speaker 11: Well, I posted about it when we when we issue the letter to the Department Justice. Posted about it on X and her Mea. Dylan's response was on it. So I think that's a good Ok. 00:23:30 Speaker 3: Well, yeah, good, I didn't see that. That is a good So I. 00:23:34 Speaker 10: Think that's a good sign. 00:23:35 Speaker 11: And I think she's done a great job in that position the Civil Rights Division, which by the way, was a cessful cesspool for radical leftist for years and so a lot of those lawyers have left. She's rebuilding the ranks with people who actually believe in the rule of law. 00:23:51 Speaker 10: And this is a great example. 00:23:52 Speaker 11: I think of of not just accepting. 00:23:54 Speaker 10: The Supreme Court. I mean, the Supreme Court decision was. 00:23:57 Speaker 11: Very positive, but now playing offense with that, and I think that's what separates us from the Democrats. We have to play to win here, and we'd be doing it for all the right reasons. It's been pretty clear by the Supreme Court you cannot have racist maps. The Democrats have relied on racist maps for a long time. And by the way, in the broader sense, in these redistricting fights, outside of the racist maps in states like Missouri and Texas where you've seen it, we should continue to play offense there too, because you can't have political determinations on how you draw maps. 00:24:26 Speaker 10: The Supreme Court was very explicit about that too. 00:24:28 Speaker 11: Because if you look at a map of New England there, even though forty percent of that region is Republican, there's not a single Republican representative Congress. 00:24:37 Speaker 3: We should be taking the fight to them everywhere. 00:24:39 Speaker 11: Senator absolutely, so, take you take those think of the Southeast Conference, right, a Southeast Conference, think of those states. 00:24:46 Speaker 10: Be aggressive. We can add you know seats there. 00:24:49 Speaker 11: Take on the Voting Rights Act there, continue the deportations there, have the you know, the census and the you know, people voting with their feet over the last decade. I think we're going to come out on top here, but we have to be smart and aggressive. 00:25:01 Speaker 5: Well in the census. You're right, is really gonna help. There's no doubt about it. Okay, So two other things I want to get to and I know you've got to run here, but Save America Act ending the filibuster talking filibuster. 00:25:13 Speaker 3: Uh are you seeing any momentum there? 00:25:15 Speaker 5: I mean, I thought Paxton was very smart the way he threw that to Corn and said, hey, I'll drop out of the race. 00:25:20 Speaker 3: If you get behind this. 00:25:22 Speaker 5: I mean, I I want to call him the same thing for Lindsey Graham and South Carolina. 00:25:26 Speaker 3: You know, but again, I can do that. You can. I understand you've got you've got colleagues in the Senate. 00:25:31 Speaker 10: But I've been I've been very clear about this. 00:25:34 Speaker 11: So uh, you know, in talking to President Trump, if just to kind of step back, you know, Mike Lee had the had the Senate version with the uh you have to prove citizenship and you have to show photo. I d I worked closely with the President and talking with him about adding those three other features to Save America, which is, you know, making sure you get rid of mail in voting fraud that's been out there uh, and making sure men can't compete with women in sports, and getting rid of the you know, the transgender mutilation of our kids. So that substitute amendment that lays there, that's mine. So there's nobody more committed to this than me. I think the answer, Andrew, is that we have to dedicate the time on the talking filibuster and then that we're gonna see, let the chips fall where they may. We're never gonna know unless we try, and that just takes a commitment of time, honestly, make the Democrats hold the floor. Now, Look, they're gonna ask for quorum calls and we have to have fifty one people go out there. But that's a good way to determine who's really committed to this thing, right, And so that's where I'm at on it. I wish we would spend Yeah, I wish we just need to spend the time on it, and we're running out of that time, so we need to be dedicated to it when we get back in June. 00:26:43 Speaker 5: Yeah, I found myself wondering this morning. And again, I know you can't say as much as I can, so you can be quiet here if you need to, Senator, But I spound myself wondering this morning what the world would look like if Senator Scott was was the. 00:26:57 Speaker 3: Leader of the Senate and not Thune. 00:26:59 Speaker 5: But here we are, all right, So one last minute here, sir, there was a I just saw this. It was an AP story that a federal judge has declined to halt President Trump's executive order creating a federal voter list and limiting mail voting. So it's still being challenged in other states. But just as a legal mind, I'm sure you remember this story. You sign an executive order saying that the US Postal Service will have a list of actual approved voters in a federal election. 00:27:26 Speaker 3: Do you think this will stand up to legal muster? It's being challenged everywhere. 00:27:29 Speaker 10: I think so. 00:27:30 Speaker 11: I mean, there's nothing preventing us having accurate voter information. I mean, again, that's how crazy this debate has gotten. That and I guess, actually, I'll pull back a little bit. Twenty years ago, there was something called the Carter Baker Commission, which was a bipartisan commission of Jimmy Carter and James Baker, and they came together and said, what are the ten things we can do to ensure election integrity in this country. 00:27:55 Speaker 3: Yeah, I remember this, Yes, remember this. 00:27:57 Speaker 11: By limiting mail and voting to prevent fraud and making sure people really need to if they can't be there because of medicinally, that's fine, but you got to limit it. That's a big piece of it. So didn't used to be controversial. It is now we got to move forward on this stuff. 00:28:07 Speaker 5: Senator Eric Schmidt, one of the good guys fighting for you in the US Senate. 00:28:11 Speaker 3: God bless you, sir. We'll talk to you soon. 00:28:13 Speaker 5: All right, guys, all right, Blake another day, and the hits keep coming from Tofuller tall. 00:28:21 Speaker 3: Rico, He terrible, tall Rico, terror Tlerrico. 00:28:24 Speaker 5: So I love the Internet for this reason. So so okay, now we have the matchup. It's Paxton VI tall Rico. And people are starting to dig through the old interviews that he's done, these clips from south By Southwest of him saying crazy stuff. Now they're going back through the Joe Rogan interview. They're finding even more stuff. And it's just too good because he's just so bad, and it's so we owe it to you. We have a moral obligation to expose just how crazy this is. Blake you made the point. He's like a bad AI. 00:28:53 Speaker 6: Yeah, like an AI generation, Like create a Democrat circa twenty twenty one, who's going to do all of the AI beats. So he's gonna you ask him a question, what do you care about most. 00:29:06 Speaker 3: Trans Yes, trans kids exactly. 00:29:09 Speaker 5: So he's like Pete Boudhage Edge meets Beto O'Rourke, but just more effeminate. Okay, so here, I gotta play this cup because it's just so stupid UHT nineteen. 00:29:19 Speaker 12: Part of this Christian nationalist movement isn't it is trying to pass these things called private school vouchers. So he's taking dollars out of the classroom and giving it to unaccountable private schools, usually Christian private schools. Again part of this effort to blur the lines between church and state. 00:29:38 Speaker 5: Okay, so there's so much here that is worth unpacking. First, let me just say school choice is undeniably one of the very best things the state can do for its students, especially poor families. Okay, it a lot of students are trapped in underperforming schools, failing schools, public schools that are indoctrinating their to become like James Tall Rico. You don't want that, obviously, so it's a no brainer. We do it here in Arizona and it's amazing. 00:30:08 Speaker 3: All the families love it. 00:30:10 Speaker 5: So basically, you get a seventy five hundred dollars tax credit a voucher to use at a private school, and a lot of people do it. So if you're stuck at a crappy public school, guess what. You got private options and it's like this boon. It's this whole entrepreneurial industry has emerged with new schools popping up in their classical education, classic Christian education. I mean, they're amazing and usually they cost about the same amount a year to send your student there, so they're like seventy five hundred bucks, maybe eighty five hundred bucks. You can pay extra thousand bucks, but your students are getting an education that suits your values and it's amazing. People love it here. Okay, guess who doesn't love it? The teachers unions. So why does James tal Rico really want to demonize school vouchers as Christian nationalism? It breaks the stranglehold of the teachers unions. And guess what. The teachers unions are a super pack for Democrats. They are get out the vote machine, they're door knockers, They're sending millions and millions of dollars to their preferred Democrat candidates. 00:31:06 Speaker 3: They don't like that. 00:31:07 Speaker 6: It's the most sensor to thing. It's the total capture of every institution in American life to just be funnel money to a Democrat cartel. And it's actually a reversion to a very old way of doing things, because what was life like if you lived in a decrepit feudal system like France before the revolution. Everyone's you have different nobles, and they all have their different noble privileges because their grandpa pa fought at the Battle of something or other five hundred years ago. They have the right to collect this this tax fee in their local area. 00:31:39 Speaker 7: It's exactly like this. 00:31:40 Speaker 6: Oh, we're a public school teacher, we have the right to get all of these tax revenues that go to us. Do we need to make sure we actually teach kids? 00:31:47 Speaker 4: No? 00:31:48 Speaker 7: Do we even need to have school in person? 00:31:49 Speaker 3: No? 00:31:50 Speaker 7: We get to, you know, demand shutdowns whenever we want. 00:31:52 Speaker 6: Is there any accountability for us not letting your kids get molested? 00:31:55 Speaker 4: No? 00:31:56 Speaker 7: And are you allowed to leave? 00:31:57 Speaker 3: No? That's why they hate the vouchers. 00:31:59 Speaker 7: And of course his. 00:32:00 Speaker 6: Biggest donors are going to people who send their kids to private schools. In the Bay Area. 00:32:07 Speaker 5: Public school his donors are all going private school. 00:32:10 Speaker 3: Okay. 00:32:11 Speaker 5: Secondly, he says it's Christian nationalism. Okay, well, what does he want at a public school. He wants your kids trapped in an indoctrination center that is transnationally the secular cult of wokeness. He wants your kids being indoctrinated from a very young age to be just like him, woke mind virus, the whole kitten kaboodle, trans LGBTQ, celebrating trans Day and Flag Day, all that kind of crap. That's what he wants instead of going to a Christian school where they learn to worship Jesus. That's coming from a Christian. Suppose it a heretical Christian. And by the way, this is the last thing I want to point out of that clip, unaccountable. Do you see all these schools are unaccountable. 00:32:55 Speaker 3: Well that's not true. 00:32:56 Speaker 5: First of all, they have certain benchmarks they need to meet, they need to get a credited All that stuff remains true. But what that is that's code for their uncontrollable because you got to remember, the secular left believes that your kids belong to them, your kids belong to the state. That's why you get laws in California where they can basically kidnap your kids. If you don't agree with the trans cult, if you have not bent the knee to the Trans god, the golden calf of Trans, then they get to take your kid away from you. They get to kidnap your kid because they believe that the kid belongs to them, not to the parents. So unaccountable, that's code for you can't control it. And that's bad to a leftist, to a patriot, to an American, to a constitutionalist. You realize that's in God's design because God set up the nuclear family. It is the building block of civilization, and they can't touch it. If they can touch it, they can destroy civilization. They can destroy the founder's vision for this country. They can destroy traditional America. If we can preserve it, then we can preserve the country. And they hate that. Ta Rico is not just weird, he's not just dangerous. He's a con man. He's a snake oil salesman posing in a Christian skin suit. And it needs to be called out. And by the way, we got another clip. Here we went a little longer than I was expecting to. How long is this clip? We got enough time? 00:34:18 Speaker 3: Here we go. 00:34:18 Speaker 5: This is him telling you that it's not a Christian nation. Actually top thirty six. 00:34:23 Speaker 12: But I think it's really important to clarify that we were not founded as a Christian nation. We were founded as a nation where you were free to be a Christian or a Jew, or a Muslim, or a Sikh, or a Buddhist or an atheist. I mean, that is the that's the promise of America is that we are this multicultural melting pot where no one is told how to pray and no religion is elevated over the others. 00:34:47 Speaker 5: Blake, do you think the founders are really worried about Sikhs and Muslims? 00:34:51 Speaker 6: You know what's funny is I wonder if they even knew what a Sikh was at that time, and certainly Islam. I mean, they thought it was an exotic they'd heard of it, they'd heard it was an exotic religion for a broad but I don't think I think they would have all admitted America would have been an incredibly different nation. 00:35:05 Speaker 7: If we were filled with Islamic jahadis. 00:35:09 Speaker 5: I want to talk to you about an issue so many Americans face, and that's health insurance. There's an organization I really really appreciate called Christian Healthcare Ministries CHM is a faith based alternative to health insurance. And this is real stuff. Folks like you gotta listen in. With CHM, You're not paying into a company's profit margin. You're investing in a community with less overhead than the competition. You get reliable support through the giving and prayer of fellow members. Members contribute every month to help pay for each other's medical bills, allowing believers to afford the care they need. Because they're not insurance, you get access to your preferred doctor or hospital without network restrictions. You heard that right. If you want to see massive savings in your healthcare budget, HM has four low cost programs for every stage of life, starting at just one hundred and fifteen dollars a month plus. You can enroll or switch your program at any time. See why so many believers are taking a leap of faith. Start today by visiting cchmnistries dot org, slash Charlie and use promo code Charlie for a fifty percent credit towards your first month. That'shministries dot org. Slash Charlie and use promo code Charlie. I'm very excited about our next guest, and that is Peter Schwarz Schweitzer, who's a longtime friend and guests of the show, and he's the author of an incredible book called The Invisible Coup, and he's making headlines because he's ruffling all the right feathers. 00:36:38 Speaker 3: Peter, welcome back to the show. It's good to have you. 00:36:41 Speaker 4: Good to be back with you. Thanks for having me. 00:36:43 Speaker 5: Well, so you have really gotten under the skin of some of our of our friends down south, the our Mexican neighbors. Claude Shinbaum's really upset about you. So you have you've been basically saying that these Mexican consulates in the United States, there's. 00:36:59 Speaker 3: Fifty three of them. 00:37:00 Speaker 5: By the way, fifty how do we need fifty three Mexican consulates in the United States. It's probably because we have too much illegal immigration. 00:37:08 Speaker 3: But I digress. There's fifty three of. 00:37:10 Speaker 5: Them here, and you have alleged that they've been up to some no good things, some things that are against our interests as Americans, which doesn't shock me. Now Mexico is denying this, of course, they're calling you a big, fat liar. Peter, tell us what the allegations are that you've put forth in some of the evidence you have for that. 00:37:28 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, you're quite right. 00:37:29 Speaker 13: There's fifty three Mexican consulates in the United States. Just to put that into perspective, there are four alone in the state of Arizona. Great Britain has six in the United States. China has seven. So this is a massive number. And what I lay out in the book is really quoting Mexican officials and describing what they're doing. And those consulates are meddling in American politics. They are organizing anti Trump protest rallies, they are organizing anti ice rallies. 00:38:00 Speaker 4: I highlight in May. 00:38:01 Speaker 13: Of twenty twenty four, a presidential election year, of course, there was a meeting at the Oklahoma City consulate that Mexico has. There were officials that flew in from Mexico City, consular officials from Los Angeles to Orlando and the consults in between all gathered there. 00:38:18 Speaker 4: And what do they do. 00:38:19 Speaker 13: They met with Democratic Party political organizers and the conversation was about how they could turn states from red to blue, and they bragged about how they had turned California from red to blue, Arizona from red to blue, and they wanted to do more of that. All of this, by the way, comes from a transcript of that meeting that we obtained from the Mexican media. So this is not me alleging this. This is what they are doing. And the bottom line is, I don't think anybody would defend the fact that foreign diplomats are meddling in American politics. You also have a Mexican official that lives in the United States, and I'm Alejandro Roblaze. He serves in the Mexican Parliament. He bragged it in twenty twenty five he was crossing the United States organizing the militancy against Donald Trump. In his words, So again, why we're allowing foreign government officials to do this is beyond me. 00:39:18 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, listen, I've long been on this. I have a lot of conversations behind the scenes about how the Mexican government is incentivized to help illegals get into the United States, what to do when they get here. And by the way, Peterson remittances back to Mexico. Mexico wants that money too, and guess how they get it. They get it by sending their people to go get work here and they go into Western Union or money Gram or one of these remittance companies that sends it back to their home country. And that's a really big deal, a really big part of the Mexican economy. 00:39:54 Speaker 3: And they're very aware of that. So what do they do. 00:39:56 Speaker 5: They send out pamphlets. They have a Gia del mcgrante meh. So they give this to people that are attempting to cross. Obviously, the border is way more secure now, but it wasn't just a little while ago, and there was millions of them coming over, and they're incentivized. So the whole thing and how, and your point is so well made. Fifty three there's no excuse for having fifty three Mexican consulates in the United States. This is a foreign invasion of another, of another kind. And they're incentivized to turn red states blue because that will give more immigrants opportunity to cross that because they know the Democrats are pro open borders, they're going to bring them in. And you get blue states, you get less pushback against this, you get more remittances. 00:40:38 Speaker 4: Yeah, no, you're exactly right. 00:40:39 Speaker 13: It's a cycle that Mexico's elite benefits from. 00:40:44 Speaker 4: And it's not just a question of you. 00:40:47 Speaker 13: Know, the money or we're going to meddle in politics, that Mexico actually has ambitions in the United States. 00:40:54 Speaker 4: There's this concept reconquista. 00:40:56 Speaker 13: I always thought it was like a kind of a ridiculous conspiracy theory, except for the fact that Mexico's leaders talk. 00:41:02 Speaker 4: About it all the time. 00:41:03 Speaker 13: And what they mean is re exerting sovereignty over parts of America that they lost in the nineteenth century as a result of the US Mexican War when they sold territories to US. 00:41:15 Speaker 4: They actually talk about this openly. And these aren't cooks. 00:41:18 Speaker 13: These are the most powerful senators in Mexico. These are top aids to President Shinbaum. This is former President Amlow, And they talk about exerting Mexico's sovereignty into. 00:41:28 Speaker 4: The United States. So how do they do that. 00:41:31 Speaker 13: Well, one of the things they've done is they have elected Mexican officials, senators and members of parliament who live full time in the United States and their job is to represent Mexicans living in the United States before the Mexican government. That is a massive erosion of our sovereignty. Imagine if we did that to Canada. Imagine if we said we're going to have a congressman representing Americans living in Alberta. The Canadians would never go for that, and for rightful reason. But that's for decisely what Mexico's doing. So this is an effort to immigrant, to use immigration as a weapon, to weaponize immigration, and I think we need to recognize that, Yes, it creates unsafe streets, mass immigration, suppresses wages, all the issues that we have talked about for years, but there's also a weaponization that is designed to undermine the United States. And they are open about it in their discussions among themselves, and I quote them extensively in the book. So when Shine Mom attacks me, you notice she doesn't deal within any of the evidence. She doesn't deal with the fact that I quote one of her top aides in a December twenty twenty four report saying through mass migration, we are retaking portions of the United States. 00:42:45 Speaker 4: She doesn't deal with that. 00:42:46 Speaker 13: She simply says this is a conspiracy theory and wants it to go away. 00:42:50 Speaker 6: It's really infuriating, and it gets the power of media narratives to guide things because we hear endlessly, we hear a lot about China, justifiably, we hear endlessly about is real allegedly controlling the United States or influence in this in the United States. And then it's just right in front of us that a country next door to us that has by far the most immigration into the United States will openly talk about this, openly glowed about. 00:43:12 Speaker 7: The effect it has. 00:43:13 Speaker 6: The effect is so clearly negative overall on the United States. It's a country that has a long history bad blood with US, and at the same time it's it's like the major media and even frankly a lot of the right wing media, they just almost conspire to just have it not be talked about. And it's almost I think that's a bigger picture thing because you think of does anyone really know Mexico's history in the US? Very few people do, despite the fact that it's right next door to us and people vacation there and so many of them move here. 00:43:41 Speaker 7: People don't know a lot about Mexico. 00:43:42 Speaker 6: They don't talk a lot about Mexico, they don't think about the effect Mexico has on the United States. 00:43:47 Speaker 3: You hear more about Canada now. 00:43:49 Speaker 4: I think that's a really important point. 00:43:51 Speaker 13: And it also, frankly, the people that don't take Mexico's ambition seriously are kind of stereotyping them. I mean, they'll say, like, come on, it's Mexico. 00:44:00 Speaker 4: They're corrupt, They're kind of hapless. 00:44:03 Speaker 13: No, I mean, I think that does not give the Mexican political elite and not a lot of credit. 00:44:09 Speaker 4: And I will give credit to the Trump administration. 00:44:12 Speaker 13: When the book came out, I actually met in the Oval Office with the President, with the Treasury Secretary Besson, and with Secretary of State Marco Rubio laid out when Mexico was doing what China was doing. They've taken a lot of action on the issue of birth tourism that I raised with them. But they also announced several weeks ago that they are reviewing the political activities of the fifty three consulates that Mexico has in the United States. So, again, in keeping with form, the Trump administration is not concerned about taking bold action when they think it's necessary, and I don't think any other modern president would have undertaken this review with regards to Mexico. So I think it's very encouraging. 00:44:53 Speaker 2: Peter. 00:44:53 Speaker 5: You came on the show when your book launched, and I thought it was so important. You exposed a pretty devastating fact about birth tourism. And we call birth tourism, but really that's it's not an aggressive enough term actually, because it's an invasion, it's a takeover tourism. 00:45:13 Speaker 3: And I mean when we. 00:45:15 Speaker 5: Talk about the numbers of Chinese alone, and then we put that in context of the Supreme Court and that decision on birthright citizenship, I'm not hearing good reports that we're going to get this the ruling the way that we should. I'm holding out hope, but just set the stakes for the audience. How big of an issue is this actually? And you know, and maybe Blake look at some of the states and the margins of victory versus how many Chinese immigrants there are. 00:45:45 Speaker 13: The floor is yours, Peter, Yeah, I mean it's a huge problem. You know, when you look at the fourteenth Amendment, this sort of radical interpretation that basically the left is proposed, which is anybody who gets their toe across the border and gives birth, that child is granted citizenship. Even if the child is raised overseas, when they turn eighteen, they're going to be able to vote, they're going to be able to get government jobs, they can sponsor their parents as permanent residents. It's a huge vulnerability, and what China has done is exploited this on an industrial scale, as only China can do. 00:46:20 Speaker 4: So what we found was that there are more than five hundred China. 00:46:24 Speaker 13: Business sorry birth tourism companies operating in the United States and in China. They advertise openly. 00:46:32 Speaker 4: In China. 00:46:32 Speaker 13: The Chinese Communist Party newspaper the Pepers Daily has run stories encouraging members of the Chinese elite to do this. And what they essentially do is they send their girlfriends, their. 00:46:42 Speaker 4: Wives to the United States. 00:46:44 Speaker 13: They pay this firm, they get them into the country, they give birth to a baby, they get that all important birth certificate that says born in the United States. They fly home, they raise that child in China. And these are children of the elites. These are military officers, intelligence officers, CCP officials, people with a propaganda ministry, and that child will be raised in China. 00:47:08 Speaker 4: And then when you look at the scale of it, nobody knows in the United States. 00:47:12 Speaker 13: How many are doing this because when you get a birth certificate issued in our country, we don't know who the nationality of. 00:47:19 Speaker 4: The birth parents are. 00:47:20 Speaker 13: But the Chinese have looked at this, and the Chinese government and Chinese research firms say that on average since twenty thirteen, every single year, roughly one hundred thousand Chinese babies have been. 00:47:33 Speaker 4: Born in the United States. 00:47:35 Speaker 13: That includes California, that includes Hawaii, that includes territories like Saipan, which the same rule applies. They get you a citizenship. So what that means is right now, there are, according to the Chinese, more than one million US citizens I'll put that in air quotes being raised in China right now, and they're going to be able to start voting around twenty thirty. And again I share this with President Trump in the Oval Office with Mark Robio and Treasury Secretary Bessants, the White House Council was there. The President turned to the White House Council and says, we need to get this to the Solicitor General. And this was in fact part of the debate when this was argued before the Supreme Court. 00:48:19 Speaker 4: I agree with you. 00:48:20 Speaker 13: I don't think it looks good for the Supreme Court on the issue of birthright citizenship. 00:48:25 Speaker 4: But I do hold out a sliver of hope. I think the. 00:48:29 Speaker 13: Court may may come back and say that Trump can't do this to executive order, but that Congress should have the ability to limit the scope of birthright citizenship. In other words, say, if you're here illegally, if you're here on birth tourism, this does not apply. 00:48:48 Speaker 4: And the reason I say that is Brett Kavanaugh. 00:48:50 Speaker 13: Was asking the ACOU attorney who was arguing on the other side on this issue, and she said, no, you shouldn't be. 00:48:56 Speaker 4: Able to limit it at all. 00:48:58 Speaker 13: And Kavanaugh, who I think is kind of one of these guys in the bubble, was kind of incredulous, saying, you're kidding me, right, You're saying you can't put any So I'm hoping the Court will at least come back and say Congress can in fact put constraints on this, and then it's a question of getting. 00:49:13 Speaker 4: That body in Washington, d C. To actually do something about it. 00:49:17 Speaker 5: You know, I was speaking with somebody who knows the Court very well, and they were saying that John Roberts in particular has this great nation theory. Really it's sort of unideological but it's his lens through which he filters his decisions, which is, would a great nation allow XYZ to happen? And the question really is, would a great nation allow a foreign power, it's chief adversary on the international stage, the CCP, to game our immigration system to potentially deliver a decisive electoral blow to us, because they can influence states the margin of victory, and some of these states ten twenty thousand, thirty thousand, we're talking over a million, million point five Chinese nationals that would be allowed to vote in our elections to do whatever, to influence directly via our representative democracy, to change the outcome of elections. Would a great nation do that? Of course, the answer is no. 00:50:18 Speaker 6: It's such a fast stile way to view it, because of course, you know they'll bring this up and then I'll say, well, what a great nation take away citizenship from these vulnerable children. That's how that's how he's gonna end up framing it, and that's why we're not optimistic about this case. When, as you say, it's extremely obvious. How about when America was a great nation, what did it do? And America as a great nation clearly did not prioritize allowing people to sail entirely around the world and just take over this country. When America was a great nation, it didn't have unlimited welfare programs that a person could walk off a vote and loot at will because we don't enforce them and have no standards. 00:50:53 Speaker 7: And yet that's also what they're doing. 00:50:55 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, ludicrous operations. 00:50:57 Speaker 5: We are a great nation, but we should not be We should not be allowed to be made suckers of by foreign nationals that especially want the worst for America, that make noe butts about it. And Peter, you should end on this note. What does the CCP really want for America? They want our good or they want our ill? 00:51:14 Speaker 13: Well, you know, I quote them in the book, and you can find it online if you go and look at some of even the Chinese CCP English language sources. They say that they view this as a civilizational struggle. This is not just about military conflict and trade and spheres of influence. It is a civilizational war between in their words, the Judeo Christian West and the CCP, and they intend to win it. 00:51:42 Speaker 4: And what I would add to what you said, I think very well about Justice. 00:51:47 Speaker 13: Roberts's view is it's been said numerous times by justices that are more liberal and those that are more conservative. 00:51:53 Speaker 4: The US Constitution is not a suicide pact. 00:51:57 Speaker 13: And given how easy it is for these million foreign nationals who are now US citizens, who have no connection to our country, to establish citizenship in so many states, you can literally show up in some states a week before an election, and this has happened where twenty five foreign nationals will rent an apartment, claim citizenship, and. 00:52:18 Speaker 4: Vote in that election. 00:52:20 Speaker 13: That is the kind of manipulation you were setting yourself up for. So hopefully the Court comes to its census and makes. 00:52:26 Speaker 4: The right choice. 00:52:27 Speaker 13: But we've got to keep fighting on this issue because it represents the future challenge for a country, this invasion or what I call this invisible coup. 00:52:36 Speaker 3: Invisible coup. 00:52:37 Speaker 5: Get your copy today, Peter, great work as always. And you know, just a note, the fourteenth Amendment does not grant birthright citizenship to illegals. As a matter of fact, that's not what it was intended for. So let's just start there, Supreme Court. It's not that hard, so obvious. Peter Schweitzer, Thank you, my friend. We'll talk to you soon. 00:52:53 Speaker 4: It was great to be with you. 00:52:54 Speaker 5: Thanks, gentlemen. Let's get real for a second. Are you frustrated with today's woke dating scene? The apps, the games, the endless swiping. It's a waste of time finding a woman who shares your values faith, family, patriotism. If it feels nearly impossible, it doesn't have to. Selective Search, America's leading matchmaking firm, is changing the game. They connect strong, successful men like you, Men who love God, love America, want a family with women who share your values. These are intelligent, faith driven women who put family first and still believe in traditional values. 00:53:30 Speaker 3: Imagine that. 00:53:31 Speaker 5: If you're a single conservative man in his late thirties to early fifties in southern California, listen up. Selective Search has an exclusive network of women ready for the real thing. Here's the best part. Their candidate program is one hundred percent free and confidential. Some of our closest friends the show have used Selective Search, and let me tell you, they're meeting great, great women, high quality women. This is your chance. This isn't an app, it's your answer. The perfect conservative woman is out there way for you. Visit selective search dot com, slash California. Today, let the professionals introduce you to women already looking for someone like you in southern California. Don't wait for the perfect match. Take action now, go to Selective search dot com slash California and start. 00:54:17 Speaker 3: Building the future you deserve. 00:54:21 Speaker 5: Without further ado, we have Alex Dine ninety nine, the man, the myth, the legend. Haven't had him on the show and way too long, by the way, Alex. And it occurred to me that that was the truth. That I was like, Alex, you gotta come on. So how you doing, my friend, Howard? 00:54:34 Speaker 2: Things I'm doing good, Things are good. You know, we have broke this huge story. 00:54:39 Speaker 14: Trevor Williams was being discriminated by the director of community relations for the Washington Nationals. 00:54:44 Speaker 2: And actually have some breaking news and I'm going to break on your show right here. 00:54:47 Speaker 3: Fantastic for mine. 00:54:48 Speaker 14: So I am good friends with Derek Holland. He played in the Majors for thirteen seasons and he played on the Pirates with Trevor Williams. And so he called Trevor Williams last night, and Trevor Williams is pissed, and don't the only reason that he hasn't been more outspoken and really address This is because Trevor Williams is such a team player. He doesn't want to rock the boat. He doesn't want to mess up the season. He's on the IR But I just have inside information straight from Trevor Williams. He's really upset. But it is frustrating because we need Trevor Williams to speak out because sadly, if this was a Muslim player, a Jewish player, a black player, a Chinese player, it would be the biggest mainstream story, you know, of all of sports and just you know, the political world. But because it's a Christian and traditionally Christians are oftentimes discriminated against. Christians don't fight back enough, you know, they are you know, easily bullied. And so that's why we need Trevor Williams to come out and say something. But I do actually appreciate that he's putting the team first. 00:55:40 Speaker 3: I love that. 00:55:41 Speaker 5: Well, that's that's great news, and I'm glad to hear that he's upset. 00:55:44 Speaker 3: He should be. 00:55:45 Speaker 5: So let's give the audience a little primer here and just in case you're not aware of this, so Alex Stein is teamed up with James O'Keefe and they did another sting operation. 00:55:54 Speaker 3: We love James here. 00:55:55 Speaker 5: They did a sting operation on the Washington Nationals director of community relations, and the guy just was like vicious to Trevor Williams. Basically, if you've ever been to a baseball game, and one of the reasons I want to do the story outs I'm a huge baseball fan, love it. I don't miss a game at night if I can. I'm a Dodgers fan, deal with it, and so like I try and catch all the games. But they do these little things where they, like in between the the innings, you know, while they're warming up and the offenses going to defense and they're switching over, they'll do like fun things like is a hot dog a sandwich game right? And then the fans have to ask the question and they get the players involved and it's goofy. 00:56:33 Speaker 3: It's fun. It's kind of entertainment in between innings. This guy dogs on him just like he's too Christian. Whatever. Here you go clip thirty one. 00:56:42 Speaker 8: One of our. 00:56:43 Speaker 2: Pitchers, do Trevor Williams. 00:56:45 Speaker 8: He is very cap The Dodgers had a group out to the stadium who were drag queens who sometimes dressed up as knots. He went on, like a social media like this is wrong. 00:56:59 Speaker 2: SMI religion. 00:57:00 Speaker 8: You all are mocking it because we don't use him on social like when they're like is a hot dog as sandwich? And like the players come up, you know what I mean? Like, we don't ask you if you ever come to a NAVS game, there is someone on our team who is responsible for figuring out everything about you or getting your requifer of your Google history one of our pictures. Do Trevor Williams. 00:57:21 Speaker 5: Okay, the religious discrimination's bad enough here, Alex, But that last part that he admitted to that like they're they're basically tracking everybody that comes into the into the stadium, Like that's terrifying. 00:57:35 Speaker 2: Well, Andrew, that's what I thought too. 00:57:37 Speaker 14: But if you actually ask people, because we've done some Man on the Street videos talking about this specific story, and everybody is kind of just understands when you sign the terms of service, we don't even have privacy anymore. So I would have thought more people would be outraged on the fact that when you go to a baseball game, they're getting all under Google data. But really and truly, people don't even care about that, and I was actually really shocked. I was really really surprised that people were not more upset about the Google dataly because I was very upset when he said that. 00:58:03 Speaker 5: Well so, And I want to remind people of this, uh, this twenty twenty three story with the Dodgers, because again I'm a Dodger fan, and it pissed me right off, I'll tell you that much. The Dodgers made the decision to honor this queer and transactivist performance group that dresses in satirical nun habits. It's called the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. And it was a complete disgrace and it it was dealing. I mean, you're a Catholic here. I mean, I don't want to like steal the thunder from you, but like they dressed as much a queer trann He's dressed up like Catholic nuns, and it was It's. 00:58:41 Speaker 7: Just a complete mockery. You could not get away with it with any. 00:58:47 Speaker 6: Like if we the Sisters of Dirka Derka Jihad and they like fake blow themselves up, do you think Dodgers would do that display out a game. 00:58:54 Speaker 3: I would go to that game, but I don't think they would though. 00:58:57 Speaker 5: To answer your question, Yeah, and they got the Commute Hero Award, they got the Community Hero Award. And now I was paying very close attention to the story. Guys like Blake tryin In, guys like Clayton Kershaw at the time, they I mean Clayton went straight to the Dodgers management and said, this is offensive. You need to bring back where the day where we get to share our faith. So the Dodgers for years had done a share their Faith day so you could come to the stadium early and the Dodgers, like Christian Dodgers would actually preach the gospel and ask people to accept Christ at Dodger Stadium. They did this for years. I think after COVID they stopped. During COVID they stopped and they didn't bring it back. So Clayton Kershaw demanded they bring it back, and now they have it back every year so they do a whole gospel presentation because of this. Thanks to Clayton Kershaw. 00:59:47 Speaker 2: Well, two little factorys. 00:59:48 Speaker 14: I want to say that I actually was Little League teammates with Clayton Kershaw at Allan Port. Okay, I played yes, and I'm Matthew Stafford as my quarterback. Actually just recently tweeted a picture. 00:59:58 Speaker 2: Of when we were on our litter. 00:59:59 Speaker 3: They're a great guy. 01:00:00 Speaker 14: Clayton Kurse awesome, But Clayton Kershaw got more canceled for putting a Bible verse on his hat then, you know, actually having a strip tease outside of the stadium. 01:00:08 Speaker 2: What's Let's be. 01:00:08 Speaker 14: Real, we're adults. We like sports, but it's really for kids. I mean, it's bringing your family to the game and having this cool experience. 01:00:14 Speaker 3: My kids are begging me to take them to a Dodger game right now. I am genuine. 01:00:22 Speaker 2: It makes no sense, though, Andrew, they're having a drag queen strip show outside of a baseball game. 01:00:28 Speaker 14: You know, I maybe I understand in West Hollywood at a Pride parade, which I don't. You know, I don't like that, I don't want that, But I mean, there is a time and place for everything, and I don't think that there is a worse place to try to indoctrinate kids and do this weird transgender ideology other than a baseball game. 01:00:43 Speaker 2: And so this is a targeted attack on the youth. And with Trevor Williams, the other thing I wanted to say. 01:00:48 Speaker 14: One of the reasons that people haven't talked about is the reason why he was targeted was not just for speaking out against the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence and the transgenders at the baseball game. He actually every single team that he's been on, he leads a Bible study with all the players. Derek Holland was part of that Bible study. So he's not just like a you know, a milk toast Christian. He's an all in Catholic guy that wants to spread the Gospel to everybody that he can. 01:01:11 Speaker 2: So that's why he was targeted in this. Like I said, this is a big story, but it should be much bigger. 01:01:16 Speaker 5: And just to put a finer point on it, they're basically relegating this guy to obscurity because he's a Catholic. They won't put him on any of the social media, they won't put him on any of the fan videos, they won't put him on anything. They're like, you know, it to quote a great quote a great woman. Actually, you know, they're just it's the shut up and dribble. But it's not because he's backing somebody in China and the CCP and billions of dollars because he's backing Jesus Christ. That's how obscene this is. You got to call Sean Hudson, director of community relations for the Washington Nationals, who's. 01:01:46 Speaker 3: Now on leave. 01:01:47 Speaker 5: Thank goodness, thanks to you guys. You got to call him and confront him. I thought, this is a fascinating video. I don't understand how you made this happen, so I want the backstory after the video. 01:01:57 Speaker 3: It's top forty five. 01:01:58 Speaker 15: Oh hey, Sean, this is Alex Stein. How are you doing, my friend? Well, you know, the Nationals are doing okay this year. But I had a question. Do you know when Trevor Williams is going to be back on the field? 01:02:10 Speaker 10: Great question. 01:02:11 Speaker 2: He is rehabbing right now. 01:02:14 Speaker 10: It's sorting bullpen sessions, which is really exciting. 01:02:16 Speaker 14: Do you think it'd be realistic when he's back and he's playing. Would you be willing to share him on the social media in the future, because we know that there's a team directive right now where you said that he's not allowed to be shared because he's a Christian. 01:02:28 Speaker 15: Is that correct? You said that you can't share him because he was against a transgender nun group for the Dodgers or something that doesn't sound like something I would say. 01:02:39 Speaker 2: The players, Ea, you're kind of up to their own discretion on not. 01:02:42 Speaker 4: Likely they want to be shared on social. 01:02:44 Speaker 15: Oh so the players choose to be shared on social, you don't choose that. Well, it's kind of like some guys are more engaging than the other ones. 01:02:52 Speaker 5: It's kind of like, yeah, it goes on and in the edit because we had to kind of fast forward it. But like the edit, you you go back to the video we played before where he's doing exactly what you're calling him out on. So for two questions, what has happened to him since he is on leave? 01:03:07 Speaker 3: But tell that story? 01:03:09 Speaker 5: And two, how the heck did you get him on the phone and get him so like trying to engage you, like he was talking to somebody that was going to be friendly to him. 01:03:16 Speaker 14: Well, you know, I kind of tried to be a good cop on the phone. I think that's why he was engaging with me at first. And he is on administrative leave, which is good. But this is a big lesson that everybody needs to learn. If you look like Uncle Fester and you're three hundred pounds and you're a short bald guy and you're on a date with a ten, you probably shouldn't go and spill your guts. 01:03:33 Speaker 2: I think that was his first mistake, trying to. 01:03:36 Speaker 14: Impress a hot girl, and I know, the undercover journalist, I'm not gonna exposure, but she is very attractive, way out of his league. 01:03:42 Speaker 2: So that is a lesson that everybody needs to learn. 01:03:44 Speaker 14: If you're on a date and she's out of your league, you do not give her any inside information. 01:03:48 Speaker 2: And you know, this is the other thing that is frustrating about this. Andrew. Of course we got to call this out, but you know, I don't like life ruination. You know, I don't like the fact that this guy's life is ruined, but I don't like that he's targeting. 01:03:59 Speaker 4: You know. 01:03:59 Speaker 2: Trevor williamsre I'm here. 01:04:00 Speaker 14: So it's just like I said, Like, I don't feel bad at all. I think it's very important that we expose this. But I just hate that this is the world that we live in. I hate that you guys get attacked. I don't like, you know, I want to be a copacetic. I want to see kumbaya, hold hands and have fun. Maybe I'm a woodstack hippie. So it does kind of stink that this guy's. 01:04:15 Speaker 2: Career is over. 01:04:16 Speaker 14: He's never gonna work in the majors probably ever again. But that's just the cold, hard reality. When you discriminate against a player for his Christianity, or his race or anything for that matter, you shouldn't be working in a professional sports organization. So it's a very bad day for Sean Hudson. I don't know how he recovers in one of the most egregious things that he said. He said he'd rather work for the Boston Red Sox because they're more liberal, And in my mind, I thought traditionally Boston is known. 01:04:39 Speaker 3: As kind of a you know, working spoken. 01:04:42 Speaker 2: Yeah, well, guess what I'm saying. I just I didn't think that they were that woke. I know the city of Boston is, but I think his. 01:04:46 Speaker 5: Heart racers it is hard. Yeah, he wants to be a communist in Boston. Alex Stein, you have a show here on the Real America's Voice Network. Tell us about it thirty Seconds. 01:04:56 Speaker 14: After Hours with Alex Stein, Monday through Friday, eleven PM. Easter and we got some great guests. Tonight, we have a crazy guest on I'm sure, you guys saw Her name is Shelby Campbell and she is the Democrat running in Michigan against the theory Kadumda. 01:05:10 Speaker 2: I don't know how to say his last name. 01:05:11 Speaker 14: The guy that beagles, Yeah, yeah, no, not Abdul said, the guy that his first name's Thchri. My point is she was well known for towerking, so we're about to call her out on that. But sadly, I'd rather have the twerking congresswoman than the freaking dog abuser. 01:05:27 Speaker 5: Alex Stein ninety nine, My man, good to see if my friend, we'll talk to you soon. Getting prescription medications shouldn't be this complicated, but for a lot of people it still is. Appointments, waiting rooms, delays, it all adds up. But there's a better way to do this. With All Family Pharmacy, you get to take control of your health care without the hassle. Simple, safe, secure, simple to order from home safe medications from a licensed US pharmacy, and secure checkout from start to finish. With access to over four hundred prescription medications, you can connect with a provider and have what you need delivered right to your door if appropriate. A licensed doctor provides the prescription as part of the process. Everything is handled with fast, secure shipping and a reliable experience you can trust, because at the end of the day, it's not just about medications. It's about peace of mind, knowing you're covered no matter what comes your way. Code All Family Pharmacy dot com slash kirk and use code Kirk ten for ten percent off. Stay ready, Take control today. All Family Pharmacy dot com slash kirk, use code Kirk ten for ten percent off. As you guys know, if you've been watching for a little while, Near and dear to my heart and to Blake's heart, both of our hearts, is the issue of immigration. 01:06:40 Speaker 3: We have to stay on it like white on rice. 01:06:42 Speaker 5: It is the total transformation of our country, and it's happening right under our noses, often as it's happening legally, which is very upsetting. This is one of the reasons I've become a supporter of blowing up the filibuster, nuking it and getting stuff done if we can, if we can, which is unclear, This is why we need to reform the US US Senate, little by little, piece by piece. We need Paxton's, not Cornin's. We need Lynches, not Grams. It's happening slowly, but surely. The US Senate is getting reformed. So keep the faith, stay the course. We're making progress. But one of the senators that we lost, it was a good guy that was a friend of the show, is Secretary Mark Wayne Mullin from the state of Oklahoma. He's now the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. Now there's been a little consternation within the base that he was not going to be tough enough, that he was gonna fold, that he was gonna be giving goodies to illegals to try and make deals with Democrats. Okay, now listen, I do think that there needed to be some recalibration DHS. Right, we lost the pr war and we need to come to grips with that. With what happened in Minnesota, you know, the alex pretty the Renee good stuff they won that they won that fight that we saw polling just swing wildly against us. Then you saw home and go in there. He kind of settled things, settled the ship. And that's good. That's good because what we want, and I'll repeat this commas not drama. You want lots of illegals getting out and you want low drama, you want to stay off the front page. Okay, But now Secretary Mullen is making some news, some headlines, and I think for beautiful reasons. An Idi floated on this show, and it looks like it's found some fertile soil at DHS place out twenty five And we. 01:08:28 Speaker 16: Have to decide where we're going to prioritize our federal employees. So we're not going to halt the flights. What we're saying is we just won't be able to process them because we don't have officers there. We're going to pull out our customer Border patrol officers that process these flights and put them in these facilities to help protect our employees coming out to work. That by the way, and that's not their job. Their job is to do just what they said, customer and border protection. However, since local law enforcement isn't able to do their job because they said, quote they don't have the resource, well, we have to prioritize our resources as well. 01:09:04 Speaker 5: So just to make sure you picked up what he's saying, he's saying that international flights to say, I don't know Newark, New Jersey, where there's a bunch of ice protests going on right now. Well, if you are going to be a sanctuary city and you're not going to enforce immigration law, well then why should we have to handle your customs and border protection at the airports for international flights. You know what, as a matter of fact, maybe there's a red state, maybe Florida, maybe Texas that could take those flights and do a better job managing deportations and illegal visa overstates in this and the like. This is a massive, massive vulnerability for blue states that want the international travel, that want the tourist money. So all of a sudden, you're gonna make it really hard for tourists to get to New York City because they're not going to enforce immigration laws, or Newark, New Jersey. This is a great idea. It's thinking outside of the box, and I totally support it. Here's what I'll just say about Secretary Mullen little faith. I'm hearing things behind the scenes that we're getting commas not dramas. Okay, that's what we want. We want commas, not dramas. There's a way to work and cooperate and keep things off the front page that is good for the country. And we'll get more of these illegals out of it. Okay, but there's another story going on, Blake about a hunger strike. Hunger strikes, yes, hunger strikes. 01:10:21 Speaker 6: So people are so upset at the prospect of being sent out of our country, which we're told is irredeemably sexist and racist and oppressive and genocidal and really the worst country to ever exist in human history if you're not white, and they're so upset at the prospect of being sent away from it that they are refusing to eat. 01:10:39 Speaker 7: And they're also mad. 01:10:40 Speaker 6: Because they're not getting enough food, which we are told is the main reason we need immigration is we won't have nice enough restaurants otherwise. 01:10:48 Speaker 5: Everyone here, as Morgan said, you know, he would trade a bunch of immigrants as long as he get his chicken curry, his chicken tika masala, whatever it was. 01:10:55 Speaker 6: It's almost perfect poetry that people will say that, because you could just imagine a children story where someone loses their house because they're offered. 01:11:04 Speaker 5: Little story giving up his birthright for a freaking bull of porridge. But in this case it's chicken tiaka missaut. 01:11:10 Speaker 4: D and C. S. 01:11:11 Speaker 7: Lewis they feed him Turkish delight to convince whom to do evil. 01:11:15 Speaker 3: It's it's just nasty place. Op. Thirty. 01:11:18 Speaker 16: It shows that this radical left Democrats priorities. When they decide to go out and protest a detention center or we're housing rapists. 01:11:27 Speaker 2: Child predators, murderers, they. 01:11:29 Speaker 16: Say that they're that it's because they're on a hunger strike, when there was only a handful of individuals that was refusing to eat because they want their ethnic group or their ethnic right food. Well, they can go back to the country and get whatever food they want. The fact is we're giving them the calories say they want. 01:11:43 Speaker 3: This isn't holiday inn it's not a holiday in. Here's my word to you. 01:11:48 Speaker 5: If you are going to get detained by ice and then be defiant and want to protest that with a hunger strike, be my guest. 01:11:56 Speaker 3: Hunger strike away. And if in the worst of secretary. 01:11:59 Speaker 5: Of momenters, spot on, if you want your ethnic food, you can get the hell out, deport go home. You'll get all the ethnic foods you want. And that's the way it should be. We are not going to kowtow to these foreigners who want our culture to reflect theirs. 01:12:13 Speaker 3: This is our home. 01:12:14 Speaker 5: This is our country, and if you want your ethnic food, by all means, we will even help you self deport We'll give you a one way ticket back to whatever third world country you came from and you can enjoy your ethnic food there. 01:12:28 Speaker 3: That is obscene to me. 01:12:29 Speaker 5: And the fact that this kind of crap would have worked one administration to go shows you how far gone the Democrats have really become. Because you know, and I have to say this to all the black pillars and the accelerationists who say vote Democrat because we're not getting. 01:12:43 Speaker 10: What we want. 01:12:44 Speaker 5: Goodness gracious, could you imagine the Biden administration response to this. First of all, they wouldn't be in detention, and second of all, they'd be giving them debit cards full of cash and a plane ticket to their favorite US citizen city with free housing at the expense of veterans that can't find hope homes. And they would say, I'm so sorry, we're so racist. Please welcome in and take everything. And here's a vote. By the way, you can also vote. So when you are tempted to blackpill when you're tempted to give into despair, into nihilism, just remember how much better things actually are under this administration. Do you get everything you want all the time? No, but at least you have a Secretary of Department of Homeland Security saying take a hike. This isn't the holiday inn get real and in the meantime, hopefully we can get peace in Iran and that we can start focusing domestically. There's a lot of good things, a lot of good things happening, and it's up to us to stay focused and positive, stay focused on winning, not giving into despair. 01:13:41 Speaker 3: Blake final word to you. 01:13:43 Speaker 6: You know, you get a country, and we're very lucky to have a very good one, and it would be a very big shame if we threw it all away in order to keep our ethnic restaurants or to keep from offending people. And there's example after example throughout history. We can I actually think of that standardized test story we did yesterday, where we can have unlimited nice things in America. We can have incredible schools, we can have the best education system in the world. We just have the courage to have to have the courage to come out and say some people are smarter than other people, and we have ways of finding that out. And it's the same thing with immigration. We can have an amazing country that brings in only the absolute best people. We just to be willing to admit some people are worth having and some people aren't. 01:14:25 Speaker 3: Some culture all you have to do. 01:14:27 Speaker 6: You have to admit that, and you can have the best country in the world for centuries to come. You just have to go through the awkward thing of saying some people are better. 01:14:39 Speaker 5: For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to Charliekirk dot com.